Cobb has said his clients didn’t know about the deal when they agreed to sell their combined 38 percent ownership stake in Ocean Therapy Solutions for $1.9 million

(AP) NEW ORLEANS – Actor Kevin Costner testified Thursday that he was heartbroken as he watched millions of gallons of oil spew into the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 and that he headed to New Orleans to see if cleanup devices he helped develop could aid the recovery effort.

Costner, who has been sued in a multimillion-dollar business dispute involving the devices, told jurors he was nervous.

“My name is at stake,” he said.

Costner was on the stand for about an hour at a civil trial centered on the lawsuit in U.S. District Court in New Orleans. His testimony is expected to resume Friday.

Video: Costner, Baldwin in court over BP dealTrial opens for suit against Costner over BP deal

The suit was brought by actor Stephen Baldwin and his friend Spyridon Contogouris. It claimed that Costner and his business partner, 카지노사이트 Patrick Smith, duped them of their share of an $18 million deal for BP PLC to buy the oil-separating centrifuges after the 2010 oil spill.

Costner’s attorney, Wayne Lee, has said his client played no role in Baldwin’s and Contogouris’ decision to sell their shares, for $1.4 million and $500,000, respectively, in a company that marketed the centrifuges to BP.

“Kevin Costner is here for one reason and one reason only: He’s famous,” Lee said in opening statements Monday.

On Thursday, the eight jurors in the case looked on as Costner was questioned by plaintiffs’ attorney James Cobb about his history with oil cleanup machines as well as various business relationships and dealings that have transpired since his affiliation with the technology in the early 1990s.

Costner said he has a passion for technology, particularly environmental technology, and enjoys supporting the work of engineers and scientists. He said that after the oil spill, he went to New Orleans on a “fact-finding mission” to see if technology he was invested in could be used to aid cleanup efforts.

“I came down mostly because of the legacy of the (oil cleanup) machine and because the Gulf was in trouble,” Costner said.

Cobb’s initial questions barely made mention of Baldwin directly, but rather focused on Costner’s business history and the role of the actor’s celebrity status in BP’s decision to buy his company’s devices.

“I’m not just a celebrity,” Costner said during testimony. “I’m not just a person who opens doors.”

Cobb told jurors earlier this week that Costner and Smith spun a web of lies that cheated his clients out of millions of dollars and that the case is about deception “fueled by power and greed.”

Baldwin and Contogouris are seeking more than $21 million in damages. Costner and other defendants also are seeking damages in counterclaims.

At the height of BP’s efforts to stop the massive flow of oil from its blown-out well, the company ordered 32 of the centrifuges and deployed a few of the machines on a barge in June 2010. BP capped the well the following month and the well was permanently sealed in September 2010.

Baldwin and Contogouris claim they were deliberately excluded from a June 8 meeting of Costner, Smith and BP executive Doug Suttles, who agreed to make an $18 million deposit on a $52 million order for the 32 machines.

Cobb has said his clients didn’t know about the deal when they agreed to sell their combined 38 percent ownership stake in Ocean Therapy Solutions for $1.9 million.

Costner’s testimony Thursday didn’t get that far. It made mention of an earlier meeting with Baldwin and others that Costner described as one of the most “disorganized, dysfunctional” meetings he’d ever been part of.

Pacific West Resources, a company operated by Costner and Smith, also is a defendant in the case.

Related Posts

Tuesday on “CBS This Morning,”Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of New York, described the pontiff as “as calm and personable as could be” when he held court for on the plane|Dolan emphasized that the pope’s comments do not signal a change in church doctrine or Catholic ideology|My job is to present it as clearly as possible.'” However, “it could be a change in tone or emphasis,” Dolan said, explaining that thus far, the new papal leader has struck a “gentle, merciful, understanding, compassionate, tone|”They shouldn’t be marginalized|(CBS News) Pope Francis held a press conference that extended beyond an hour aboard his flight back to the Vatican on Monday and made unexpected comments signalling an openness to gay priests}
In it, Garzon, a slightly-built 52-year-old with short-cropped gray hair and glasses, appears shaken and at times hesitant. He sits in a simple chair in front of the judge, with four rows of chairs behind him in the small courtroom. Garzon is wearing a dark jacket and trousers with an open-necked shirt. Behind him are two men in dark uniforms, and several other unidentified people are in the room. He also answers questions from a prosecutor. Garzon’s testimony added little new to what is already known about the crash on the evening of July 24 as the high-speed train, carrying 218 people in eight carriages, approached the capital of Spain’s northwestern Galician region. But the video was the public’s first look at the court testimony of the driver who walked away from the accident with a gash in his head. ABC said its footage showed 18 minutes of excerpts from the full 55-minute session, accompanied by what it said was a transcript of the full session. The paper said it obtained a copy of the video that the court took of the session but has not made public. The train had been going as fast as 119 mph (192 kph) shortly before the derailment. The driver activated the brakes “seconds before the crash,” reducing the speed to 95 mph (153 kph), according to the court’s preliminary findings based on black box data recorders. The speed limit on the section of track where the crash happened was 50 mph (80 kph). In his Sunday night testimony, Garzon said he was going far over the speed limit and ought to have started slowing down several miles (kilometers) before he reached the notorious curve. Asked whether he ever hit the brakes, Garzon replied, “The electric one, the pneumatic one … all of them. Listen, when … but it was already inevitable.” His voice shakes, his sentences break down and he appears close to tears as he replies to a question about what was going through his mind when he went through the last tunnel before the curve. “If I knew that I wouldn’t think it because the burden that I am going to carry for the rest of my life is huge,” he said. “And I just don’t know. The only thing I know, your honor, sincerely, is that I don’t know. I’m not so crazy that I wouldn’t put the brakes on.” Garzon said that after the derailment he called central control in Madrid about the accident. “At the speed I was going and the smashup, though I couldn’t see what was behind me. I knew what I was up against and I knew it was inevitable that there was a calamity and so (I called Madrid) to activate the emergency protocol,” he testified. Garzon also explained a photograph on his Facebook page which showed a train speedometer registering 124 mph (200 kph). He said he took the photo “as a laugh or whatever you want to call it” while a colleague was driving a test train on a different track some time ago. His Facebook page was taken down shortly after the crash. It is not known who removed it. The investigating judge is trying to establish whether human error or a technical failure caused the country’s worst rail accident in decades, and Garzon is at the center of the investigation. The judge provisionally charged Garzon on Sunday with multiple counts of negligent homicide. Garzon was not sent to jail or required to post bail because none of the parties involved felt there was a risk of him fleeing or attempting to destroy evidence, according to a court statement. National rail company Renfe said Garzon is an employee with 30 years of experience who became an assistant driver in 2000 and a fully qualified driver in 2003. Garzon went back to court, voluntarily, to offer more testimony on Wednesday. In that second appearance, he said he was talking by phone to the train’s on-board ticket inspector moments before the accident and hung up just before the train left the tracks. But that contradicted what the court said the black boxes showed – that Garzon was on the phone at the time of the derailment. The court said the inspector would testify Friday as a witness. It said the judge has ruled that while the phone call was inappropriate it could not be considered a cause of the accident. Health authorities say 57 people from the crash are still in the hospital, 11 of them in critical condition.
“As of now, we don’t have communication (with the three towns) and the roads are not passable, even to motorcycles, due to landslides, rockslides and uprooted trees,” said Rey Balido, spokesman for the national disaster agency

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *