“We believe that the continued provision of assistance to Egypt, consistent with our law, is important to our goal of advancing a responsible transition to democratic governance and is consistent with our national security interests,” the official said

Coup or not a coup?

That question bedeviled the Obama White House in the immediate aftermath of the military-led sacking of the Egyptian government led by the nation’s first democratically-elected president, Mohammed Morsi.

Prominent members of Congress, including Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and 부산출장안마 Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., branded the ouster of Morsi a coup and urged the White House to suspend $1.5 billion in military and non-military aid in accordance with federal law.

The administration said repeatedly it would study the “complex” facts in Egypt and render a verdict.

Now it has.

Never mind.

The White House will not make a determination on whether Egypt’s tumultuous change of government constitutes a coup or if federal law requiring cessation of U.S. aid in the aftermath of a coup applies.

“The law does not require us to make a formal determination as to whether a coup took place, and it is not in our national interest to make such a determination,” according to a senior administration official. “We will work with the Congress to determine how best to continue assistance to Egypt in a manner that encourages Egypt’s interim government to quickly and responsibly transition back to a stable, democratic, inclusive, civilian-led government that addresses the needs and respects the rights and freedoms of all its people.”

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki on Friday gave the same message: “We believe the continued provision of aid is appropriate, consistent with our national security interests,” she said. “The law does not require us to make a formal determination — as to whether a coup took place — and it is not in our national interest to make such a determination.”

The administration has determined keeping U.S. aid flowing or, in the case of delayed delivery of F-16 fighter jets, holding it back without canceling it entirely, increases President Obama’s leverage in moving Egypt’s transitional government toward a return to democratic procedures.

“We believe that the continued provision of assistance to Egypt, consistent with our law, is important to our goal of advancing a responsible transition to democratic governance and is consistent with our national security interests,” the official said.

“It is important that Egypt’s leaders and people understand that the United States is committed to supporting them as they work through these difficult political transition issues. Egypt serves as a stabilizing pillar of regional peace and security and the United States has a national security interest in a stable and successful democratic transition in Egypt.”

Related Posts

Special Section: Gulf Coast Oil DisasterStephen Baldwin suing Kevin Costner over BP dealKevin Costner pitches $895M oil spill plan Feldman asked the potential jurors whether the entertainers’ on-screen portrayals compromised the ability to deliver an objective verdict. No one in the pool said they would feel influenced. Among Baldwin’s roles was caveman Barney Rubble in “The Flintstones: Viva Rock Vegas.” Costner’s films include “Dancing with Wolves,” “Field of Dreams,” and “JFK,” Oliver Stone’s film with New Orleans connections to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Baldwin and Costner did not interact before the proceedings started. Baldwin told The Associated Press his attorneys had advised him not to comment. Baldwin and his friend, Spyridon Contogouris, said they didn’t know about the deal when they agreed to sell their shares of Ocean Therapy Solutions, a company that marketed the centrifuges to BP, for $1.4 million and $500,000, respectively. (At left, watch Costner testify to Congress about the machine in 2010) Baldwin and Contogouris claim they were deliberately excluded from a June 8 meeting between Costner, his business partner Patrick Smith and BP executive Doug Suttles, who agreed to make an $18 million deposit on a $52 million order for the 32 devices, according to the lawsuit. Later that month, Costner and Suttles visited Port Fourchon, La., to talk about the plan to use the centrifuges. “It was designed to give us a fighting chance, to fight back the oil before it got us by the throat,” Costner said at the time. Baldwin and Contogouris say they were entitled to shares of BP’s deposit. Their lawsuit claims Costner and Smith schemed to use BP’s deposit buy their shares in Ocean Therapy Solutions. “Maybe one of the directions that Mr. Costner might go as a defendant in this case is that he had taken a great deal of risk as it relates to these machines,” legal analyst Chick Foret told WWL-TV. Costner said he didn’t attend a June 6, 2010, meeting at which Contogouris agreed to sell his OTS interests. “Not only did Costner not know that Plaintiffs were negotiating to sell their OTS interests, he was surprised and offended by the idea that Contogouris and Baldwin would walk away from OTS with almost $2 million in cash despite having invested no money in the company, and at a time when a contract with BP was uncertain to materialize,” says a court filing summarizing Costner’s version of events. Baldwin and Contogouris are seeking more than $21 million in damages. Costner and other defendants also are seeking damages in counterclaims.
Speaking in Italian with occasional lapses in his native Spanish, Francis dropped a few nuggets of news: -He said he is thinking of traveling to the Holy Land next year and is considering invitations from Sri Lanka and the Philippines as well
The repercussions have been unsurprising: Cards and letters ending up at the wrong house

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *