Although there is no firm rule as to who should walk a bride down the aisle, one person is highly unlikely: Prince Harry

With just days to go until the royal wedding on Saturday, Meghan Markle is apparently ironing out a major wrinkle in the plans: Who will walk her down the aisle to marry Prince Harry? Her father, Thomas Markle, was supposed to do the honors, but following several days of conflicting reports about whether he will or won’t attend his daughter’s wedding, he told TMZ he needs to undergo heart surgery and won’t be able to travel. He sparked controversy earlier in the week when he posed for embarrassing photos in exchange for payment from a paparazzi agency, and amid the tabloid frenzy said he had suffered a heart attack. 

부산출장안마The flurry of reports set off speculation about who would walk Markle down the aisle at Windsor Castle if her father wasn’t there. 

There is no set rule that dictates who walks the royal bride down the aisle, The Perfect Day, a U.K.-based wedding forum, says. “It is traditional for the bride to walk down on the right arm of whomever gives her away. Her hand shall then be placed into the groom’s as an act of ‘giving her away,'” the publication writes in their “Definitive Guide to Wedding Etiquette.”

More in The Royals

Here are some of the possibilities.

Her mother, 부산출장안마 Doria Ragland, is one potential option. Markle’s parents are divorced and she appears to be closer to her mother than her father. Ragland, a yoga teacher and social worker in Los Angeles, was seen with her daughter and Prince Harry at the Invictus games last September, Entertainment Tonight reports.

She has also been helping Markle with some of the wedding planning. It was rumored that Ragland would walk her daughter down the aisle back in January, when the royal couple first announced their engagement. 

Markle’s future father-in-law, Prince Charles, is also a viable option. Many brides are walked down the aisle by their fiancé’s father;  this typically happens when the bride’s father is deceased. In Markle’s case, the future King of England could be the one to do the honors.

Prince Harry’s older brother, Prince William, and his wife Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, were some of the first members of the royal family to meet Meghan, ET reports. Therefore, it makes sense that Prince William could step in to walk Markle down the aisle, due to the couples’ closeness. 

The royal family has had a similar situation in the past. When the late Princess Margaret wed Anthony Armstrong-Jones in 1960, Prince Philip — the husband of her sister, Queen Elizabeth II — accompanied her down the aisle, according to Town & Country. Princess Margaret had her brother-in-law walk her down the aisle because her father, King George VI, had died before the wedding.

Although there is no firm rule as to who should walk a bride down the aisle, one person is highly unlikely: Prince Harry. During U.K. weddings, the groom traditionally has his back to the congregation and does not watch the bride walk down the aisle, Inside Weddings says. This is a tradition Prince William and Duchess Kate stuck to.

It is even possible Markle will walk herself down the aisle. 

It’s unconfirmed at this point which, if any, of these options are under consideration, or if Markle’s father is really going to skip the wedding, as he said Monday. Thomas Markle told TMZ that he does not want to embarrass his daughter or the royal family after taking several staged photos for a paparazzi agency. 

Kensington Palace released a statement saying, “This is a deeply personal moment for Ms. Markle in the days before her wedding. She and Prince Harry ask again for understanding and respect to be extended to Mr. Markle in this difficult situation.” 

Related Posts

While U.N
But, like Snowden, players can get help from the outside, represented in the game in the form of a cell phone call to “Uncle Putin,” who will drop one Soviet-era hydrogen bomb to shake Jake off the trail for a while|Getting caught by Jake earns the player a one-way ticket to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba}
The draft resolution — if it were to be put to a vote — would almost certainly be vetoed by Russia and China, which have blocked past attempts to sanction President Bashar Assad’s regime. Late Wednesday, Britain’s mission to the U.N. said no decision had been made on moving forward with its resolution, CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk reports from U.N. headquarters in New York. After the council fell short of reaching an agreement, State Department deputy spokeswoman Marie Harf told reporters in Washington that the U.S. sees “no avenue forward” given Russia’s past opposition to action by the council on Syria. “We’ve consistently said that we support U.N. Security Council action,” Harf told reporters. “Instead, what we’ve seen, not just today, not just last week, but over the course of many months, is the Russians at every move doing things to fail to hold the Syrian regime accountable.” Britain put forth the proposal Wednesday as momentum seemed to be building among Western allies for a strike against Syria. U.S. officials, including Vice President Joe Biden, have charged that Assad’s government used deadly chemical weapons near Damascus last week. The U.S. has not presented concrete proof, and U.N. inspectors currently in Syria to investigate alleged chemical attacks have not endorsed the allegations. The American government’s assessment is based on the circumstantial evidence from videos posted on the Internet, and, as CBS News correspondent David Martin reported Tuesday, intelligence – much of it still classified – ranging from intercepted Syrian communications to tests of tissue samples taken from victims. The U.N. envoy to Syria, Lakhdar Brahimi, said Wednesday that evidence suggests some kind of “substance” was used that killed hundreds on Aug. 21. Falk reports that the five permanent members of the Security Council met in a closed-door, informal meeting to discuss the U.K. resolution Wednesday morning, with Russia and China leaving after an hour and the U.S., France and the U.K. remaining for another hour. None of the countries’ representatives, including U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power and British Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant, commented on a plan to move forward. After the ambassadors met, the draft resolution was being sent back to their governments for consultations, according to a Western diplomat, who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the discussions were private. The diplomat said Russia reiterated its objections to international intervention in the Syrian crisis. A spokesman for British Prime Minister David Cameron said in London that the British draft resolution would authorize “all necessary measures under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter to protect civilians from chemical weapons.” Chapter 7 allows the use of international armed force to back up U.N. decisions. Speaking Wednesday from The Hague, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said no action should be taken until the U.N. chemical weapons inspectors finish their work. “Let them conclude … their work for four days and then we will have to analyze scientifically” their findings and send a report to the Security Council, he said. The U.N. said the analysis would be done “as quickly as possible.” Ban also pleaded for more time to give diplomacy another chance to end the more than two-year conflict that has killed more than 100,000 people. But the secretary-general added that the Security Council must not go “missing in action.” Meanwhile, U.N. chemical weapons experts on Wednesday took biological samples from several victims of last week’s purported attack, activists said Wednesday. Fear of a dramatic escalation in the two-and-a-half-year conflict prompted some 6,000 Syrians to flee into Lebanon over a 24-hour period, or more than six times the average daily flow. A jittery Israel ordered a special call-up of reserve troops Wednesday as residents lined up at gas-mask distribution centers, preparing for possible hostilities with Syria. A week after the purported attack, momentum has been building for a possible strike by the U.S. and its allies against the Assad regime. At the same time, Syria’s main allies Russia and Iran warned of dire consequences for the region if a military intervention is launched. Syria, which sits on one of the world’s largest stockpiles of chemical weapons, has denied the charges. Local opposition activists told CBS News that a convoy of U.N. inspectors had reached the town of Mleiha, in the sprawling Ghouta area, and videos posted online by the activists showed them interviewing patients at clinics in Mleiha and the nearby town of Zamalka. One video showed the inspectors visiting a clinic and interviewing a man through a translator. Two inspectors were present as a nurse leaned over a man lying on an exam table. One of the experts is heard in the video saying he and his team members have collected blood, urine and hair samples. One activist said the team took hair and skin samples of five suspected victims in Zamalka during a 90-minute visit. He spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of regime reprisals. The U.N. team in Syria did not issue a statement about Wednesday’s trip. Marking the centenary of a venue for peaceful conflict resolution, the U.N.’s Ban said: “Here in the Peace Palace, let us say: Give peace a chance. Give diplomacy a chance. Stop fighting and start talking.” The growing fear of escalation sent wider ripples across the region. Lebanese security officials in the country’s Bekaa Valley near the border with Syria said at least 6,000 Syrians have crossed into Lebanon in the past 24 hours through the main Masnaa border crossing, including an estimated 4,000 on Wednesday. The normal daily rate is 500 to 1,000 Syrian refugees coming to Lebanon, depending on the level of fighting. Witnesses said they saw long lines of cars packed with families and belongings at the crossing. There was also traffic in the other direction — a security official said around 2,000 crossed into Syria on Wednesday — but many of them said they were going in to evacuate relatives from Syria. Um Ahmad, 45, crossed to Lebanon with her five children Wednesday, fearing U.S. strikes on Damascus. “Isn’t it enough, all the violence and fighting that we already have in the country, now America wants to bomb us, too?” she said, declining to give her full name for security concerns. Her husband said they have no one in Lebanon but came anyway because of their children. “What will we do here, where will we go? I don’t know — but hopefully we’ll be safe.” Nearly 2 million Syrians have fled their country since the crisis began in March 2011, and millions more are displaced inside Syria. In Israel, the government ordered a “limited” call-up of reserve units to beef up civil defense preparations and to operate air-defense units near the border. Officials said the call-up is anticipated to bring in “hundreds” of troops. Israel fears that Syria may respond by attacking the Jewish state, a close American ally. While Israeli officials believe the chances of a Syrian strike remain slim, people were clearly preparing for the possibility. Large crowds lined up at gas-mask distribution centers. Maya Avishai of the Israeli postal service, which oversees gas mask distribution, said demand has tripled in recent days. About five million Israelis, roughly 60 percent of the population, now have gas masks, she said. Jordan, meanwhile, said it will not be used as a launching pad for attacks on Syria and the kingdom favors a diplomatic solution to the crisis. A U.S.-led strike would involve cruise missile attacks from the sea, which would not need to cross or make use of Jordanian territory.

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *