Corporate villains, usually – the big pharmaceutical companies in “The Constant Gardner,” and money laundering banks and the international arms and drug trade in others, like “The Tailor of Panama.” Now he’s pulled two of his favorite themes together

\uc5f0\uc0b0\ub3d9\ucd9c\uc7a5\uc548\ub9c8,\uc5f0\uc81c\uad6c\ucd9c\uc7a5\uc548\ub9c8 010*2590*7735 \u2014 \uc548\ub155\ud558\uc138\uc694. \ubd80\uc0b0 ...John le Carre is the pen name of David John Moore Cornwell, whose work has revealed much about the world of British Intelligence for which he once worked. When he spoke with our Mark Phillips, 부산출장안마 he started things off with a revelation of his own:

“This is my last American interview,” le Carre said. “We don’t have to publicize that …”

When we sat down to interview John le Carre, we didn’t know just how privileged we were.

He had already announced he’d done his last British interview. Now, John le Carre says this session with us will be his last anywhere. He’s stepping off the publicity treadmill.

Twenty-two novels and eleven film and TV adaptations later, it’s not like he needs the attention.

“I’m physically in good shape,” he said. “I’m going into my 80s. I want to write. I don’t want to be doing the personal publicity any more.”

Le Carre has been a book and movie machine for more than half a century. If anyone knows how to turn ideas into pages and then into movies, he does.

It’s a collaborative effort where he writes, and then uses his wife Jane as his first sounding board … a process we witnessed in a “Sunday Morning” visit with them fifteen years ago.

His work has been turned into four TV series, beginning in the 1970s with Alec Guinness as George Smiley, in “Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy.”

The seven movie adaptations began with Richard Burton’s “The Spy Who Came in from the Cold” in 1965.

A “who’s who” of modern screen deities – Anthony Hopkins, Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan – have played le Carre’s heros (or anti-heros) over the years. They were attracted by the ambiguity and swinging moral compass that always made his plots and characters more interesting.

The secret of le Carre’s success in books and movies is his ability not just to see the frailties of the human condition, but to involve – even play with – his audience.

“I love the art of building up tension, and this relationship which the writer or the filmmaker has to the audience that sometimes the audience is ahead of what’s going on and sometimes the audience is behind the writer – doesn’t know,” le Carre said. “Hitchcock talked a lot about that, and I think a lot about that. That my reader is comfortable – here he thinks he knows everything – but then reverse it and he’s discomforted, and then bring him forward again.”

Now one of his classic book and TV titles, “Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy,” is being re-made into a feature film with Gary Oldman as George Smiley.

Le Carre’s spies live in a world of shades of grey – none of the good guy/bad guy clarity of the James Bond world.

That’s not an accident.

“We had the image of James Bond,” le Carre said. “He had this extraordinary life: the license to kill, all the girls he could eat and so on, and wonderful cars. He was the Superman with some kind of mysterious patriotic purpose.

“But people knew while they were watching that stuff, people knew then about this gray army of spooks that was around.”

“Is it also in its own little way, turning Bond on its head, turning Ian Fleming on its head?” Phillips asked. “Everything Bond did, from smoke a cigarette to mix a drink to make love to women, Bond did better than anybody else. By creating a sporting environment in which the good guy doesn’t necessarily always win, is that a little nose-thumb to that kind of spy racket?”

“With the bond type of novel, the reader thinks, ‘I wish I was him!'” le Carre said.

“With the stuff I’m writing, they think, ‘Oh, Christ, I hope I’m not him!'” he laughed.

If le Carre has been anything over the years, he’s been adaptable. He just about owned the literary rights to the Cold War. But he also found other universal themes: The Arab-Israeli conflict in “The Little Drummer Girl” . . . and more recently, he’s found new villains in the post-Cold War world.

Corporate villains, usually – the big pharmaceutical companies in “The Constant Gardner,” and money laundering banks and the international arms and drug trade in others, like “The Tailor of Panama.”

Now he’s pulled two of his favorite themes together.

His latest book, “Our Kind of Traitor,” is about crooked Russian oligarchs and their duplicitous friends in Western banking and intelligence.

There’s still plenty of villainy out there.

“You’re dealing with, how would you describe it? The immoral corporate world?” Phillips asked.

“Yes,” he replied.

“Are bankers the villains here? Is the corporate ethos the villain here? What’s the villain?”

“I think bankers will always get away with whatever they can get away with,” le Carre said. “An impartial body here that examined the catastrophe after the fall of Lehman Brothers declared our banking system to be socially useless, which is quite strong language coming from the right-wing.

“But at the end of the Cold War in a lecture to the trainees at a spy school, George Smiley said, ‘Now that we’ve dealt with the excesses of communism, we have to deal with the excesses of capitalism,'” le Carre said. “And I think that’s what we’re dealing with at the moment.”

It’s not that John le Carre hasn’t done very for himself in the meantime, splitting his time between London and his spread on England’s wild southwest coast.

He’ll tell you the secret of his success is not to deliver a message in his books and movies, but to tell a good story.

“It has a good beginning and a good middle and a good end,” he said. “I mean, I’m in the business of storytelling, not message making.”

And that is the last thing he wants to say.

“Actually we’re putting up on the website – even I think today – saying the door’s closed,” le Carre announced. “This really is it.”

“How can I say thank you?” Phillips asked.

“No, you can’t,” the author laughed. “You don’t have to.”

Fiction by John le Carre:

“Call for the Dead” (1961) “A Murder of Quality” (1962) “The Spy Who Came in from the Cold” (1963) “The Looking Glass War” (1965) “A Small Town in Germany” (1968) “The Naive and Sentimental Lover” (1971) “Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy” (1974) “The Honourable Schoolboy” (1977) “Smiley’s People” (1979) “The Little Drummer Girl” (1983) “A Perfect Spy” (1986) “The Russia House” (1989) “The Secret Pilgrim” (1990) “The Night Manager” (1993) “Our Game” (1995) “The Tailor of Panama” (1996) “Single & Single” (1999) “The Constant Gardener” (2001) “Absolute Friends” (2003) “The Mission Song” (2006) “A Most Wanted Man” (2008) “Our Kind of Traitor” (2010)

Non-fiction:

“The Unbearable Peace” (1991)

For more info:

johnlecarre.com”Our Kind of Traitor” by John le Carre (Viking)World Book Night (March 5, 2011) – “The Spy Who Came In from the Cold” is one of 25 books featured in U.K. promotion

Related Posts

NASHVILLE, Tenn
They said those arrested face charges of instigating violence and orchestrating attacks on police stations and churches
“It will depend on whether any UN member state goes to the secretary-general and says we should look at this event,” Sellstrom told TT from Damascus. “We are in place.” Just hours after Sellstrom made the comments, French President Francois Hollande said in a regular cabinet meeting that the latest allegations of a chemical attack “require verification and confirmation,” according to government spokeswoman Najat Vallaud-Belkacem. Vallaud-Belkacem said Holland would ask the UN team to go to the site “to shed full light” on the allegations. CBS News correspondent Holly Williams reported, however, that it wasn’t immediately clear whether the Syrian government would grant the UN team access to the Ghouta suburbs to gather evidence. Ahmed al-Jarba, the head of the Western-backed Syrian National Coalition, and the London-based Syrian Observatory opposition group also called on the U.N. team to investigate the incidents. Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, a British expert in chemical and biological weapons, told CBSNews.com on Wednesday that, based on the reported death tolls and the available video evidence — which he stressed he could not authenticate independently — it appeared that a weapon of mass destruction like Sarin gas was probably involved. In many of the smaller-scale attacks across Syria, de Bretton-Gordon has said small quantities of Sarin, or far weaker organophosphate compounds, could have been to blame, and it is feasible that poorly-trained rebel forces could have been behind such attacks. “Sarin is 4,000-times more powerful than organophosphates,” he explained, suggesting that if the toxic gas was used Wednesday on a large scale, it was “very unlikely” that opposition fighters could have been behind the attacks, as they “just don’t have access to that level of chemical weapons and the delivery means” needed to disperse them so widely. Damascus, the sprawling ancient capital city and President Assad’s base of power since the conflict erupted, had come under increasing pressure from rebel forces, which had tried to advance on the city center primarily from the east. Baghdadi reported that, according to eyewitnesses, the fierce military offensive began around 7:00 a.m. on Wednesday. One man said he counted about seven air raids and dozens of shelling targeting the district of Jobar, less than one mile from a main square in the capital. On Sunday, the 20-member U.N. chemical weapons team, led by Sellstrom, arrived in Damascus to investigate three sites where chemical weapons attacks allegedly occurred. The sites they were meant to probe are the village of Khan al-Assal just west of the embattled northern city of Aleppo and two other locations, which are being kept secret for security reasons. The Syrian government has always denied claims by the opposition of chemical weapons use, saying rebels fighting to overthrow Assad’s government have used such weapons.

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *