Instead, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spent much of her meeting time yesterday with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu trying to calm the waters with her NATO ally over the flotilla incident

Anyway you look at it the bottom line for the Obama administration is that this week’s so-called “Gaza flotilla” incident is one more problem it did not need but nonetheless has to deal with.

If only the flotilla had followed existing procedures Israeli officials claim its humanitarian aid could have been delivered to Gaza without a confrontation. If Israeli defense officials had better planned their military operation against the flotilla’s ships perhaps the incident would have been largely ignored the world’s media.

But of course those behind the operation had other plans including an overt effort the break a three year old naval blockade which Israel has imposed on Gaza. A senior State Department official told reporters “the leaders of the flotilla sought a confrontation and, unfortunately, got one.”

Magnus Norell, a Sweden-based analyst writing for The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, notes the main organizer of the flotilla, the Turkish Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH), is “closely connected with Hamas and has a long history of advocating armed struggle, including terrorism, against Israel.” Norell also cites ties between the IHH and al Qaeda although State Department officials say they cannot link the two organizations.

Even so, Israel was left to explain its handling of the operation which resulted in nine deaths. Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, who had planned to be at the White House earlier this week had to return home to handle the crisis. Netanyahu took the offensive and, while offering an apology for the loss of life, said “This wasn’t a love boat. This was a hate boat.”

Washington’s diplomatic calendar was supposed to be devoted to getting another sanctions resolution against Iran passed in the U.N. Security Council and having Special Envoy George Mitchell become fully engaged in separate talks with Israeli and Palestinian leaders.

Instead, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spent much of her meeting time yesterday with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu trying to calm the waters with her NATO ally over the flotilla incident. Only then did she attempt to convince Turkey, which now has a seat on the Security Council, to vote with Washington on the Iran sanctions issue.

Secretary Clinton was caught in the uncomfortable position between defending Israel’s right to provide for its own security and looking for support from Ankara on the Iran sanctions resolution. Perhaps fearing he would use some over-heated rhetoric on camera Clinton’s staff cancelled a scheduled photo opportunity with her Turkish colleague who had told reporters earlier that “psychologically, this attack is like 9/11 for Turkey.”

Only later, walking a fine line, 부산출장안마 did she address the flotilla controversy. “I think the situation from our perspective is very difficult and requires careful, thoughtful responses from all concerned,” Clinton told reporters.

She gave strong backing to a U N “call for a prompt, impartial, credible and transparent investigation.” While giving the nod to Israel conducting an investigation “that meets those criteria,” Clinton also left the door open for international participation, something the Israelis have not yet signaled they are willing to accept.

Clinton also labeled the situation in Gaza “unsustainable and unacceptable” and she pledged to work not only for humanitarian goods such as food and medicine to be allowed into Gaza but she pointedly said reconstruction and building supplies should also be allowed in, something the Israelis have been reluctant to approve because Hamas has been known to use such supplies for military purposes.

James Zogby of the Arab American Institute called the administration’s position on “Israel’s outrageous assault on humanitarian ships headed for Gaza, while not surprising, is nevertheless unacceptable.”

Into this combustible mix went negotiator Mitchell who attended a Palestinian economic conference and then held discussions with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Mitchell also expects to see Netanyahu on this trip.

Just how much the Gaza flotilla incident will have set back negotiations is something we will not be able to gauge for some time. At least Abbas did not back out of his scheduled meeting with the Obama administration’s envoy. Will Turkey’s vote on the Iran sanctions resolution be affected by the events this week? Could Washington have counted on its vote even without the incident?

The old saying goes that out of every crisis comes an opportunity. Perhaps. But even a writer of fiction would be hard pressed to include all the twists and turns that are rocking the administration’s Middle East policymaking efforts.

More on the Israeli Raid:

Flotilla Activists Returning to Greece, TurkeyWashington Unplugged: Israel’s “Diplomatic Mess of Mammoth Proportions”7 Things You May Not Know About the RaidWashington Unplugged: Israeli U.S. Ambassador on RaidIsrael Raises Concerns Over Relationship with TurkeyFree Gaza Movement Vows Future MissionsPhotos: Protests against Flotilla Raid

Charles Wolfson is CBS News’ State Department reporter.

Related Posts

Navy ships are capable of a variety of military action, including launching Tomahawk cruise missiles, as they did against Libya in 2011 as part of an international action that led to the overthrow of the Libyan government
Supporters of the interim government and the military are keen to see security forces clear out the protest camps where thousands of Morsi followers have been staked out for over a month, demanding his reinstatement
Assad: I’m no “butcher,” I’m like a doctor who saves livesAssad: U.S. does not have “a single shred of evidence” of chemical weapons attackBashar Assad tells Charlie Rose U.S. should “expect every action” in response to Syria strikesComplete CBSNews.com coverage: Syria crisis The Syrian president again called on the U.S. and Congress to present hard evidence proving a chemical attack was launched within Syria and warned that a strike against Syria would only foster the growth of al Qaeda within his borders. “First of all, because this is the war that is going to support Al Qaeda and the same people that kill Americans in the 11 of September. The second thing that we all want to tell to the Congress, that they should ask and that what we expect, we expect them to ask this administration about the evidence that they have regarding the chemical story and the allegations that they presented,” Assad said. President Assad said he and the Syrian people are “disappointed” by President Obama’s behavior, and compared his foreign policy to that of former President George W. Bush. “We expected this administration [to be] different from Bush’s administration,” he said. However, “they are operating the same doctrine with different accessories. That’s it. We expect if…[this administration] to be strong to say that ‘We don’t have evidence, that we have to obey…the international law, that we have to go back to the security council at the United Nations.'” If he found himself face-to-face with President Obama, Assad told Rose, he would simply tell him:” “Present what you have as evidence to the public. Be transparent.” “He didn’t present because he doesn’t have have [it],” Assad said. “Kerry doesn’t have it.” Responding to Charlie Rose’s claims that evidence has been presented to Congress, including satellite footage and intercepted messages, Assad repeated several times, “nothing has been presented,” eventually adding that even if the U.S. did present seemingly credible evidence, he would doubt its veracity. “We have the precedent of Colin Powell ten years ago when he showed the evidence, it was false and it was forged,” Assad said. “You want me to believe American evidence and don’t believe the indication that we have? We live here.”

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *