It was Lohan’s first appearance before Fox, who had said at a previous hearing he would sentence her to a month in jail for each drug test she skipped or failed|But moments before Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elden S}

BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. (CBS/AP) Updated 1:30 p.m. EST

[韩剧] 没关系,是爱情啊 794323, <strong>17<\/strong>9633″ style=”max-width:420px;float:right;padding:10px 0px 10px 10px;border:0px;”>Actress Lindsay Lohan returned to jail in handcuffs Friday after a judge refused to set bail and ordered her to remain in custody for failing a drug test until another hearing nearly a month away. </p>
</p>
<p>Pictures: Lohan Sent Back to JailPictures: Celebrity Mug Shots </p>
</p>
<p>Bailiffs escorted the troubled starlet from the Beverly Hills courtroom immediately after the hearing that lasted less than 10 minutes. It will be Lohan’s third jail stint for a three-year-old drug and drunken driving case filed after a pair of high-profile arrests in 2007. </p>
</p>
<p>Before the hearing,  <A HREF='https://www.coraL777.com/'>토토사이트</A> the “Mean Girls” star chatted with her attorney, smiling and laughing. But moments before Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elden S. Fox took the bench, she began fidgeting with her earrings and looking to the back of the courtroom, where two bondsmen sat in the courtroom, prepared to post the actress’ bail. </p>
</p>
<p>Lohan’s attorney, Shawn Chapman Holley, asked Fox whether Lohan’s full probation revocation hearing could be delayed a week. </p>
</p>
<p>“I think your client would rather have it on Oct. 22,” Fox said, giving the first hint that he intended to send the actress to jail. </p>
</p>
<p>Holley rose to argue that bail should be set. “Nope,” Fox replied. </p>
</p>
<p>“Oh God,” Michael Lohan said as bailiffs moved in; his daughter rose and was handcuffed. </p>
</p>
<p>She has twice been released early due to overcrowding, with her longest jail stay a 14-day stint on a 90-day sentence earlier this summer. In 2007, she served 84 minutes. </p>
</p>
<p>But this time, the judge’s order diminishes the likelihood that Lohan will be released before an Oct. 22 hearing, when her positive drug test will be discussed. </p>
</p>
<p>“When you put the judge in a tight spot, he has no alternative,” said Barry Gerald Sands, a defense attorney who has represented celebrity clients in drug cases. “She will not get out now.” </p>
</p>
<p>The previous judge handling Lohan’s case had said she had to set bail for Lohan because she was facing misdemeanors, and a bondsman was sitting in the courtroom ready to post bail. </p>
</p>
<p>“This judge feels he didn’t have to set bail,” Sands said, adding that Fox’s orders are rarely overturned. </p>
</p>
<p>Fox said Lohan had a “positive test for a controlled substance,” but did not name the substance. He said probation officials are also reviewing Lohan’s compliance with other aspects of her probation, which included frequent meetings with counselors. </p>
</p>
<p>Holley was not immediately available for comment. Court spokesman Allan Parachini said she remained in the courtroom to confer with Lohan. </p>
</p>
<p>Lohan’s mother, Dina, walked into the courtroom about 45 minutes after the hearing. By then, Los Angeles television stations were following a car said to be carrying her daughter to jail. </p>
</p>
<p>The two women had arrived at the courthouse together an hour before, while the actress’s father – with whom she’s publicly sparred – arrived earlier. </p>
</p>
<p>Lohan acknowledged failing a court-ordered drug screening last week in a series of Twitter postings </p>
</p>
<p>“Substance abuse is a disease, which unfortunately doesn’t go away over night,” she posted last Friday. “I am working hard to overcome it and am taking <a href=positive steps.

Other posts said, “This is certainly a setback for me but I am taking responsibility for my actions and I’m prepared to face the consequences,” “I am so thankful for the support of my fans, loved ones and immediate family, who understand that i am trying hard” and “but also that I am a work in progress, just as anyone else. I am keeping my faith, and I am hopeful….Thank you all!!!”

Related Posts

“Each survivor holds a different shaped bun or roll over their breasts to highlight that support comes in all shapes and sizes,” BCNA wrote in a statement.  “When you find out you have breast cancer, your whole world is turned upside down and your support network becomes really important to you,” BCNA CEO Kirsten Pilatti said
In it, Garzon, a slightly-built 52-year-old with short-cropped gray hair and glasses, appears shaken and at times hesitant. He sits in a simple chair in front of the judge, with four rows of chairs behind him in the small courtroom. Garzon is wearing a dark jacket and trousers with an open-necked shirt. Behind him are two men in dark uniforms, and several other unidentified people are in the room. He also answers questions from a prosecutor. Garzon’s testimony added little new to what is already known about the crash on the evening of July 24 as the high-speed train, carrying 218 people in eight carriages, approached the capital of Spain’s northwestern Galician region. But the video was the public’s first look at the court testimony of the driver who walked away from the accident with a gash in his head. ABC said its footage showed 18 minutes of excerpts from the full 55-minute session, accompanied by what it said was a transcript of the full session. The paper said it obtained a copy of the video that the court took of the session but has not made public. The train had been going as fast as 119 mph (192 kph) shortly before the derailment. The driver activated the brakes “seconds before the crash,” reducing the speed to 95 mph (153 kph), according to the court’s preliminary findings based on black box data recorders. The speed limit on the section of track where the crash happened was 50 mph (80 kph). In his Sunday night testimony, Garzon said he was going far over the speed limit and ought to have started slowing down several miles (kilometers) before he reached the notorious curve. Asked whether he ever hit the brakes, Garzon replied, “The electric one, the pneumatic one … all of them. Listen, when … but it was already inevitable.” His voice shakes, his sentences break down and he appears close to tears as he replies to a question about what was going through his mind when he went through the last tunnel before the curve. “If I knew that I wouldn’t think it because the burden that I am going to carry for the rest of my life is huge,” he said. “And I just don’t know. The only thing I know, your honor, sincerely, is that I don’t know. I’m not so crazy that I wouldn’t put the brakes on.” Garzon said that after the derailment he called central control in Madrid about the accident. “At the speed I was going and the smashup, though I couldn’t see what was behind me. I knew what I was up against and I knew it was inevitable that there was a calamity and so (I called Madrid) to activate the emergency protocol,” he testified. Garzon also explained a photograph on his Facebook page which showed a train speedometer registering 124 mph (200 kph). He said he took the photo “as a laugh or whatever you want to call it” while a colleague was driving a test train on a different track some time ago. His Facebook page was taken down shortly after the crash. It is not known who removed it. The investigating judge is trying to establish whether human error or a technical failure caused the country’s worst rail accident in decades, and Garzon is at the center of the investigation. The judge provisionally charged Garzon on Sunday with multiple counts of negligent homicide. Garzon was not sent to jail or required to post bail because none of the parties involved felt there was a risk of him fleeing or attempting to destroy evidence, according to a court statement. National rail company Renfe said Garzon is an employee with 30 years of experience who became an assistant driver in 2000 and a fully qualified driver in 2003. Garzon went back to court, voluntarily, to offer more testimony on Wednesday. In that second appearance, he said he was talking by phone to the train’s on-board ticket inspector moments before the accident and hung up just before the train left the tracks. But that contradicted what the court said the black boxes showed – that Garzon was on the phone at the time of the derailment. The court said the inspector would testify Friday as a witness. It said the judge has ruled that while the phone call was inappropriate it could not be considered a cause of the accident. Health authorities say 57 people from the crash are still in the hospital, 11 of them in critical condition.
Prisoners are seen in their communities as heroes who made personal sacrifices in the struggle for independence

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *