Secretary Hagel fully supports the President’s goal of closing Guantanamo Bay and this upcoming transfer brings us closer towards reaching that goal.” Typically, the U.S .military does not release names of the released until they have arrived in the other country

Updated 5:36 PM ET

부산출장안마WASHINGTON The White House says the U.S. intends to transfer two additional detainees from Guantanamo Bay to Algeria as part of its effort to close the military prison in Cuba.

White House spokesman Jay Carney says the Pentagon is certifying its plans to Congress and will consult with lawmakers. He says the Obama administration wants Congress to support Obama’s efforts to close the prison by lifting restrictions on who can be transferred back to their home countries.

In a statement, 부산출장안마 Carney said the White House is taking this step “in a responsible manner that protects our national security.”

Obama has stepped up the pressure to close the prison. That effort has been driven in part by his revised counterterrorism strategy and the stain of the government force-feeding Guantanamo prisoners on hunger strikes to prevent them from starving to death.

Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said a very senior inter-agency team conducted an intensive review of the matter over the past few months. “Based on their recommendations, and as mandated by Congress,” he said, “[Defense] Secretary Hagel signed off on the legal requirements to move forward with the transfer these detainees. Secretary Hagel fully supports the President’s goal of closing Guantanamo Bay and this upcoming transfer brings us closer towards reaching that goal.”

Typically, the U.S .military does not release names of the released until they have arrived in the other country.

“As a matter of long-standing policy, we do not provide the names of detainees to be transferred,” said Pentagon spokesman Todd Breasseale. “The transfer will happen when all of the necessary conditions have been met. However, we will not discuss the sensitive, diplomatic arrangements associated with the transfer. Further, we never discuss the specifics of detainee movements for operational security reasons.”

The Defense Department told Congress that it costs $454 million to operate the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay in 2013.

Related Posts

CBS News’ Seth Doane sat down with three young people in China — 22-year-old Zhang Pin Pin, 24-year-old Ren Pengfei, and 25-year-old Peng Jing Yuan — who told him they believe the U.S. see China’s rise as a threat.
“This is a movement of defensive assets operating in an air-to-air role only,” the statement continued. “They are not deploying to take part in any military action against Syria. The (prime minister) has made clear no decision has been taken on our response and the gGovernment has said that there will be a Commons vote before direct military involvement.” U.S. officials describe the Pentagon decision as prudent planning and say it doesn’t suggest the carrier would play a role in any possible strikes in Syria. The officials were not authorized to discuss ship movements publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. The U.S. had kept two carriers in the region, but budget cuts in February forced officials to cut to one. CBS News correspondent David Martin reports two submarines — one American, one British — are in the eastern Mediterranean along with four American destroyers and a fifth on the way — all armed with cruise missiles. That’s more than enough firepower for a strike Pentagon officials say would be limited to fewer than 50 targets. Each of the destroyers carries about 40 cruise missiles – a satellite-guided weapon that carries a 1,000-pound warhead, has a range of 1000 miles or more and is accurate to within about 15 feet. Standard procedure would be for the ships to fire an opening salvo at night, wait for satellites to assess the damage and re-strike any targets that were not destroyed — a process that could take a few days. Any strike against Syria, Martin points out, would be designed to convince its dictator, President Bashar Assad, never to use chemical weapons again. But airstrikes never succeeded in changing the behavior of another Mideast dictator — Iraq’s Saddam Hussein — until he was finally captured and hanged.
The letter made no mention of Khan al-Assal, but it “condemns all atrocities committed by all parties” and reiterates the coalition’s pledge to assist the U.N

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *