That’s due to the March 1 expiration of $920 million in convertible senior notes, which Tesla had to repay in cash so long as its shares remained below the conversion price of $359.87 a share

2 years agoNot so long ago, Tesla expected to turn a profit this quarter. That’s no longer the case, and the electric-car maker’s downhill slide with investors is a part of the reason.

After starting the year with its shares priced above $350 each, Tesla shares have since fallen 21 percent. Elon Musk’s unconventional approach has arguably taken a toll, as the CEO’s tweeting habit drew negative attention from U.S. regulators and Warren Buffett. 

That decline, which has Tesla currently trading around $260 a share, wiped out nearly a third of the $3 billion in cash that Tesla reported holding at the end of its September quarter. That’s due to the March 1 expiration of $920 million in convertible senior notes, which Tesla had to repay in cash so long as its shares remained below the conversion price of $359.87 a share.

The shrinking cash scenario will likely have Wall Street investors focused on balance sheet issues and financial technicalities when Tesla releases it first-quarter earnings after Wednesday’s close, according to Ben Kallo, an analyst with Baird Equity Research. 

The results “might disappoint following the convert repayment and working capital headwinds,” noted Kallo, who is nonetheless optimistic about the company and the future direction of its shares.”Tesla has indicated it ended the quarter with sufficient cash on hand, though a lower-than-expected cash number could stoke questions over the need for a capital raise,” he added.

Potential hazards to Tesla and its stock include “management actions and Elon Musk in particular, who in our view is both the company’s greatest asset and risk,” offered Garrett Nelson, an analyst at CFRA. Musk has drawn attention and even legal scrutiny in the past year for hijinks that included appearing to smoke marijuana during the recording of a podcast to tweeting a false statement to the public that Tesla would be taken private at $420 a share.   

“We think Tesla’s sequential cash burn will be one of the focal points of the earnings release, and has the potential to escalate balance sheet and liquidity concerns,” Nelson said in an email. “Disappointing first-quarter cash-flow generation combined with the convertible note repayment and Chinese financing agreements reached in March are likely to result in a significant increase in net debt, from our perspective.”

In the past, Tesla has said it expected to be cash-flow positive in each quarter after the first three months of this year. Musk, however, has changed that tune, and is now targeting a “cash-flow neutra”l status as the electric-car maker builds a fleet of self-driving vehicles for his planned ride-sharing network. 

“I feel very confident predicting autonomous robotaxis for Tesla next year,” Musk told an investor’s event Monday in Palo Alto, California. The CEO, known for making rather bold forecasts, said he expects a million Teslas equipped to drive without human help to be on the road by mid-2020. 

“Between now and when the robotaxis are fully deployed throughout the world, the sensible thing for us is to maximize the number of autonomous units made and drive the company toward cash-flow neutral,” Musk told an investor’s day event. “Once the robotaxi fleet is active, I would expect to be extremely cash-flow positive.”

Musk has long tied the success of his company to its abilities to bring an affordable Model 3 sedan to the mass market. Tesla earlier this month halted online sales of its base $35,000 Model 3, 카지노사이트 and said those leasing the Model 3 won’t be able to ultimately purchase it, as leased cars are earmarked for Tesla’s network.

Related Posts

President Bashar Assad’s government initially asked the U.N. to investigate an alleged chemical weapons attack on March 19 on the village of Khan al Assal outside the embattled city of Aleppo, which was captured by the rebels last month. The government and rebels blame each other for the purported attack which killed at least 30 people. Britain, France and the U.S. followed with allegations of chemical weapons use in Homs, Damascus and elsewhere. U.N. Mideast envoy Robert Serry told the Security Council last month that the U.N. has received 13 reports of alleged chemical weapons use in Syria. On June 13, the United States said it had conclusive evidence that Assad’s regime had used chemical weapons against opposition forces. That crossed what President Barack Obama had called a “red line” and prompted a U.S. decision to send arms and ammunition to the opposition. But agreement on a U.N. investigation was delayed for months because Syria wanted to limit the probe to Khan al-Assal and the secretary-general, backed by the U.S., Britain and France, insisted on a broader investigation. The U.N. gave approval for the probe on July 31 following an “understanding” reached with Syria during a visit to Damascus by U.N. disarmament chief Angela Kane and Swedish expert Ake Sellstrom, the team’s leader, that three sites where chemical weapons were allegedly used would be investigated. One site is Khan al Assal, but the locations of the other two incidents are being kept secret for safety reasons. For the past two weeks, the Syrian government and the U.N. have been trying to agree on arrangements for the investigation. The U.N. team completed preparations for the visit over the weekend in The Hague, Netherlands, but its departure was delayed because of differences over details of the investigation. Following Wednesday’s agreement, U.N. deputy spokesman Eduardo del Buey said “the departure of the team is now imminent,” but he provided no specific date. Under the agreement with Syria, the team will remain in the country for “up to 14 days, extendable upon mutual consent” to “conduct activities, “including on-site visits,” del Buey said. He said U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is pleased that agreement has been reached “to ensure the proper, safe and efficient conduct of the mission.” The secretary-general believes an effective investigation of allegations can serve as “an important deterrent” against the use of chemical weapons, del Buey said. “Our goal remains a fully independent and impartial inquiry,” he said. Del Buey said “the overwhelming support of the international community for this investigation makes clear that the use of chemical weapons by any side under any circumstances would constitute an outrageous crime.” The investigation team includes about 10 experts from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, which is based in The Hague, and the World Health Organization, based in Geneva. Del Buey said Ban expressed appreciation to the Syrian government for its cooperation and to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons for its support of the mission.
District Court in New Orleans
“The Sound of Music” Cast to Reunite on “Oprah”

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *