Costner and other defendants also are seeking damages in counterclaims

(AP) NEW ORLEANS – Actor Kevin Costner testified Thursday that he was heartbroken as he watched millions of gallons of oil spew into the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 and that he headed to New Orleans to see if cleanup devices he helped develop could aid the recovery effort.

Costner, who has been sued in a multimillion-dollar business dispute involving the devices, told jurors he was nervous.

“My name is at stake,” he said.

Costner was on the stand for about an hour at a civil trial centered on the lawsuit in U.S. District Court in New Orleans. His testimony is expected to resume Friday.

Video: Costner, Baldwin in court over BP dealTrial opens for suit against Costner over BP deal

The suit was brought by actor Stephen Baldwin and his friend Spyridon Contogouris. It claimed that Costner and his business partner, Patrick Smith, duped them of their share of an $18 million deal for BP PLC to buy the oil-separating centrifuges after the 2010 oil spill.

Costner’s attorney, Wayne Lee, has said his client played no role in Baldwin’s and Contogouris’ decision to sell their shares, for $1.4 million and $500,000, respectively, in a company that marketed the centrifuges to BP.

“Kevin Costner is here for one reason and one reason only: He’s famous,” Lee said in opening statements Monday.

On Thursday, the eight jurors in the case looked on as Costner was questioned by plaintiffs’ attorney James Cobb about his history with oil cleanup machines as well as various business relationships and dealings that have transpired since his affiliation with the technology in the early 1990s.

Costner said he has a passion for technology, particularly environmental technology, 카지노사이트 and enjoys supporting the work of engineers and scientists. He said that after the oil spill, he went to New Orleans on a “fact-finding mission” to see if technology he was invested in could be used to aid cleanup efforts.

“I came down mostly because of the legacy of the (oil cleanup) machine and because the Gulf was in trouble,” Costner said.

Cobb’s initial questions barely made mention of Baldwin directly, but rather focused on Costner’s business history and the role of the actor’s celebrity status in BP’s decision to buy his company’s devices.

“I’m not just a celebrity,” Costner said during testimony. “I’m not just a person who opens doors.”

Cobb told jurors earlier this week that Costner and Smith spun a web of lies that cheated his clients out of millions of dollars and that the case is about deception “fueled by power and greed.”

Baldwin and Contogouris are seeking more than $21 million in damages. Costner and other defendants also are seeking damages in counterclaims.

At the height of BP’s efforts to stop the massive flow of oil from its blown-out well, the company ordered 32 of the centrifuges and deployed a few of the machines on a barge in June 2010. BP capped the well the following month and the well was permanently sealed in September 2010.

Baldwin and Contogouris claim they were deliberately excluded from a June 8 meeting of Costner, Smith and BP executive Doug Suttles, who agreed to make an $18 million deposit on a $52 million order for the 32 machines.

Cobb has said his clients didn’t know about the deal when they agreed to sell their combined 38 percent ownership stake in Ocean Therapy Solutions for $1.9 million.

Costner’s testimony Thursday didn’t get that far. It made mention of an earlier meeting with Baldwin and others that Costner described as one of the most “disorganized, dysfunctional” meetings he’d ever been part of.

Pacific West Resources, a company operated by Costner and Smith, also is a defendant in the case.

Related Posts

President Bashar Assad’s government initially asked the U.N. to investigate an alleged chemical weapons attack on March 19 on the village of Khan al Assal outside the embattled city of Aleppo, which was captured by the rebels last month. The government and rebels blame each other for the purported attack which killed at least 30 people. Britain, France and the U.S. followed with allegations of chemical weapons use in Homs, Damascus and elsewhere. U.N. Mideast envoy Robert Serry told the Security Council last month that the U.N. has received 13 reports of alleged chemical weapons use in Syria. On June 13, the United States said it had conclusive evidence that Assad’s regime had used chemical weapons against opposition forces. That crossed what President Barack Obama had called a “red line” and prompted a U.S. decision to send arms and ammunition to the opposition. But agreement on a U.N. investigation was delayed for months because Syria wanted to limit the probe to Khan al-Assal and the secretary-general, backed by the U.S., Britain and France, insisted on a broader investigation. The U.N. gave approval for the probe on July 31 following an “understanding” reached with Syria during a visit to Damascus by U.N. disarmament chief Angela Kane and Swedish expert Ake Sellstrom, the team’s leader, that three sites where chemical weapons were allegedly used would be investigated. One site is Khan al Assal, but the locations of the other two incidents are being kept secret for safety reasons. For the past two weeks, the Syrian government and the U.N. have been trying to agree on arrangements for the investigation. The U.N. team completed preparations for the visit over the weekend in The Hague, Netherlands, but its departure was delayed because of differences over details of the investigation. Following Wednesday’s agreement, U.N. deputy spokesman Eduardo del Buey said “the departure of the team is now imminent,” but he provided no specific date. Under the agreement with Syria, the team will remain in the country for “up to 14 days, extendable upon mutual consent” to “conduct activities, “including on-site visits,” del Buey said. He said U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is pleased that agreement has been reached “to ensure the proper, safe and efficient conduct of the mission.” The secretary-general believes an effective investigation of allegations can serve as “an important deterrent” against the use of chemical weapons, del Buey said. “Our goal remains a fully independent and impartial inquiry,” he said. Del Buey said “the overwhelming support of the international community for this investigation makes clear that the use of chemical weapons by any side under any circumstances would constitute an outrageous crime.” The investigation team includes about 10 experts from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, which is based in The Hague, and the World Health Organization, based in Geneva. Del Buey said Ban expressed appreciation to the Syrian government for its cooperation and to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons for its support of the mission.
More than 350 flights were canceled or delayed and bus and commuter ferry services were curtailed
– Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *