“Most of those who died after being struck with a Taser were not armed and did not appear to pose a serious threat when the Taser was deployed,” the report said

NEW YORK A top human rights organization on Wednesday criticized the Obama administration’s increasing use of drone aircraft for the targeted killing of terrorism suspects overseas and 칠곡출장업소 questioned whether it is legal.

\ub17c\uc0b0\ucd9c\uc7a5\uc548\ub9c8 \uc644\uc8fc\ucd9c\uc7a5\uc548\ub9c8 -\ud6c4\ubd88100%\u30e7 \ub17c\uc0b0\ucd9c\uc7a5\uc0f5 \uc644\uc8fc\uc804\uc9c0\uc5ed ...Amnesty International, in its global review of human rights issues, said the U.S. drone policy is shrouded in secrecy but the killings appear to amount to extrajudicial executions that violate international rights laws.

“Our view is that the legal basis is quite unclear,” Salil Shetty, the London-based group’s secretary general, said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press. “We have issues with how the United States defines the `theater of war,’ which is a very broad definition which allows them a free reign to use drones and other weapons under a very wide set of circumstances.”

Shetty criticized the secrecy surrounding the drone strikes.

“Our researchers, when talking to people in Pakistan, find that the people are living in constant fear in very remote areas. You really cannot figure out, at the end of the day, who has been injured or killed in a drone attack,” he said.

In its report, Amnesty said “available information, limited by secrecy, indicated that U.S. policy permitted extrajudicial executions in violation of international human rights law under the USA’s theory of a `global war’ against al Qaeda and associated groups.”

Obama is expected to address his administration’s reliance on drone strikes in a speech Thursday at the National Defense University. The U.S. State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Amnesty International’s report.

On the eve of Obama’s speech, Attorney-General Eric Holder acknowledged for the first time that four American citizens have been killed in drone strikes since 2009 in Pakistan and Yemen.

The U.S. government has targeted and killed one American citizen, Anwar al-Awlaki, and is aware of the killing by U.S. drones of three others, Holder said in a letter to the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Holder said the three other Americans killed by drones were not targeted. They were Samir Khan, who was killed in the same drone strike as al-Awlaki; al-Awlaki’s 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman, who also was killed in Yemen; and Jude Kenan Mohammed, who was killed in a drone strike in Pakistan.

An official with the U.S. mission to the United Nations, commenting on a U.N. investigation of U.S. drone policy, previously said the strikes “are conducted in full compliance with the law.”

“The United States government has publicly acknowledged that it conducts targeted strikes, sometimes using remotely piloted aircraft, against specific al Qaeda terrorists,” said the official, who was not authorized to speak publicly about the issue and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Civil liberties groups and an unusual coalition of Democratic and Republican lawmakers have criticized the White House for keeping most details of the drone program secret. Particularly concerning for these critics has been the administration’s rare use of drones to kill American citizens overseas.

Drone strikes have risen under Obama. According to the Long War Journal, which tracks such attacks, there were 35 strikes in Pakistan during 2008, the last year President George W. Bush was in office. That number grew to 117 in 2010, then fell to 64 in 2011 and 46 last year.

The program has killed a number of top militant commanders, including al Qaeda’s then-No. 2, Abu Yahya al-Libi, who died in a drone strike in June.

The American Civil Liberties Union has filed lawsuits against the United States over the drone attacks that killed three U.S. citizens in Yemen in 2011.

The United States is expected to increase its use of drones and other counterterrorism techniques as the war in Afghanistan winds to a close at the end of 2014 and the vast majority of U.S. troops return home.

Amnesty International also questioned the increasing reliance by U.S. police of Taser stun guns. The group said “tasers have been listed as a cause or contributory factor in more than 60 deaths” in the U.S. since 2001.

“Most of those who died after being struck with a Taser were not armed and did not appear to pose a serious threat when the Taser was deployed,” the report said.

Amnesty said that in May 2012, “the American Heart Association published a report which presented the first scientific, peer-reviewed evidence concluding that Tasers can cause cardiac arrest and death.”

Scottsdale, Arizona-based Taser International Inc. disputed the American Heart Association’s findings at the time, saying it was based on just eight case studies. Some 16,000 agencies worldwide use Tasers, and many police departments say it is a valuable alternative to pulling a gun to try to subdue a suspect.

Related Posts

Malou Innocent, a foreign policy analyst at the Cato Institute in Washington, said the incident “reflects the deepening mistrust between the coalition and their Afghan counterparts.” She added that the incident exemplifies the “poor communication” between coalition and Afghan forces. In the more than 30 attacks Afghan government troops have carried out on NATO forces this year, 51 service members, mostly Americans, have died, more than the last two years combined, CBS News national security correspondent David Martin reports. U.S. and NATO forces suspended joint field operations with the Afghans last month because they became such a problem, Martin reported. Just last week, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said the joint operations had resumed although the reasoning behind the suspension appeared to have changed. On Wednesday, ISAF Deputy Commander Adrian Bradshaw, a British lieutenant general, told reporters that the suspension was related to the violent protests stemming from an American-made online video ridiculing the Muslim Prophet Muhammad. Bradshaw also insisted that insider attacks accounted for 4 percent of the war’s total casualties, even as reporters pointed out that they represent one-fifth of casualties from this year. His attempt to downplay the effect of the attacks contrasted with recent comments by NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who acknowledged the strain they’ve put on international troops, CBS Radio News reporter Teri Schultz reports. “No doubt insider attacks have undermined trust and confidence, absolutely,” Fogh Rasmussen said Monday. Outside Combat Outpost Little Blue, north of Kandahar, Afghanistan, Army Staff Sgt. Stephen Christopher Whitfield told CBS News correspondent Charlie D’Agata that he was concerned having his base right next to another base manned by armed Afghan forces. “Of course it does, with the insider threats that are taking place in the last couple of months,” said Whitfield, “but you deal with whatever situation you have, and we’ve never had a problem out here.” Innocent said recent controversies such as the online video showing U.S. soldiers urinating on dead Taliban fighters and the burning of copies of the Muslim holy book, the Koran, at a military base created the perception of a lack of respect for Afghan cultural values. “This is a sort of a confluence of the factors that created this incident,” Innocent said. Ruben, however, said the attacks go much deeper than a sense of disrespect. “The notion that green-on-blue violence is basically the result of personal problems between Afghan troops and their American partners is nonsense, but the Pentagon doesn’t want to consider the alternative,” he said. That alternative embraced by Ruben, a former Pentagon official who’s now a senior lecturer at the Naval Postgraduate School, is that the attacks are ideologically inspired, noting that the attackers aren’t just killing international troops but are also turning their guns on fighters in the Afghan army. “It can’t be solved by being more polite with Afghan colleagues,” Ruben said. In fact, a Taliban commander told CBS News chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan in an interview broadcast on CBS’ “60 Minutes” Sunday that insider attacks “part of our new military strategy” and “the orders come from the top.” Al Qaeda fighters have been coming into Afghanistan to work on the attacks with the Taliban, said the commander, who spoke to Logan on condition of anonymity. He told her that more than a dozen Qaeda militants operate under his command. Ruben wouldn’t say whether Saturday’s incident would have happened if Western soldiers didn’t feel threatened by insider attacks. “All I can say,” he said, “is it certainly is going to lead to some itchy trigger fingers.”

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *